An alternate version of What About Free Will?
What about Free Will?
Jay Wegter, Adjunct Professor of Theology, The Master’s College.
This book is infinitely more than a rehashing of an historic debate. It is truly an in-depth examination of God’s nature and man’s nature and the interface between the two. The author does a remarkable job of patiently describing and illustrating how and why God’s sovereignty and man’s free agency are compatible. With great grace and winsomeness, Christensen takes on his imaginary interlocutor at every turn. God is in charge and yet our choices are free and responsible—how is this so? A probing light is cast upon the proposed solutions offered by the Arminian view. Christensen develops the logical consequences of the ‘free will’ view, showing how—over and over again that view paints itself into a moral cul-de-sac.
The book is marvelously organized. With excellent subheads, diagrams and very helpful chapter summaries, glossaries, study questions, and recommended resources. The author has demonstrated the ability to take the profound and invite the reader into conversation with him. He does so by employing everyday situations and events to illustrate his points. This is central to the genius of the book. The reader is never lost in the mire of an abstract proposition. Every assertion is accompanied by an illustration from Scripture and life.
The triumph of this work is that it goes very deep while utilizing natural language. Consider the depth of the subject that inter-trinitarian love cannot be frustrated. As God extends His own love to the unworthy creature we see a brilliant argument in support of sovereign grace. Christensen dismantles the Arminian that the response to divine love must be entirely self-generated in order for the love to be genuine.
While deconstructing his opponent’s position, the author never speaks down to him. This work has a way of sneaking up on the reader. Just when you think that Christensen has fired his greatest caliber salvo, he opens up a magazine of formidable ordnance as he explicates the role of the heart in man’s desires and choices. Especially useful are the anticipated retorts from those who oppose compatibilism. Spiritual and moral freedom is freedom of a radically different kind than the freedom we exercise in the daily choices we are offered in life. No wonder Jesus associated the former with a very narrow gate and difficult path. When I think about how I might utilize this book in my own ministry, here is what comes to mind: preachers of the first and second Great Awakening had the skill to preach total inability, human responsibility, and divine sovereignty—all in the same evangelistic sermon. We seem to have forgotten how to do that. And the consequence is that we have cheapened divine grace in the process. This book has deepened my desire to emulate those preachers of generations past who demonstrated a keen grasp of theology—it filled their sermons with biblical anthropology and the doctrine of God, for God is known by how He saves sinners.